Rationale

I had just faced a pressing question. And i hope i had made the right choice.

It is always better to work from the bottom up. You will always have a better point of view when managing later from the top down. And with the grassroot support from the others, it will definitely be an easier term.

Chivalry? Lets take a look at it objectively. He does have more experience in the hall itself. Not that i would suffer so, but it means he knows his way around and how things work. In the long run, it will be more beneficial if we have a strong mandate and stand united behind a common front. Better that he run alone rather than compete. Furthermore, if during the period of his term, nay-sayers mutter "should have voted for the other one, he would have been a better choice", it would not be constructive to his workload nor his morale.

We all try to find our niche. I have many many options to explore. There are so many things to do!

And anyway, theres always next year. *evil laughter fade to black*